多任务并行处理相关面试题

发布时间:2024年01月02日

我自己面试时被问过两次多任务并行相关的问题:

假设现在有10个任务,要求同时处理,并且必须所有任务全部完成才返回结果

这个面试题的难点是:

  • 既然要同时处理,那么肯定要用多线程。怎么设计多线程同时处理任务呢?
  • 要求返回结果,那么就不能用简单的Thread+Runnable了,这个是无返回结果的
  • 最难的是,这些任务彼此间还有关系:任务全部结束才算完成

下面3个Demo,CountDownLatch的结果处理交给大家自行完成。

FutureTask

/**
 * @author mx
 */
public class FutureTaskDemo {

    private static AtomicInteger count = new AtomicInteger(10);

    public static void main(String[] args) throws ExecutionException, InterruptedException {
        // 准备10个线程
        ExecutorService executorService = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(10);

        // 收集每个任务的结果
        List<Future<Integer>> resultList = new ArrayList<>();

        long start = System.currentTimeMillis();

        // 并行处理10个任务
        for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
            // 准备任务
            Callable<Integer> task = () -> {
                // 模拟任务耗时 0~4秒
                int seconds = ThreadLocalRandom.current().nextInt(5);
                TimeUnit.SECONDS.sleep(seconds);
                System.out.println("task is completed! cost:" + seconds + "s left: " + count.decrementAndGet());
                // 模拟返回结果
                return 1;
            };
            // 提交任务
            Future<Integer> partResult = executorService.submit(task);
            // 收集结果
            resultList.add(partResult);
        }

        int result = 0;

        // 阻塞获取并累加结果
        for (Future<Integer> future : resultList) {
            result += future.get();
        }

        // 最终全部任务完成,总耗时取决于最耗时的任务时长
        System.out.println("all task is completed! result=" + result + " cost: " + (System.currentTimeMillis() - start) + "ms");
    }
}

结果展示

task is completed! cost:0s left: 9

task is completed! cost:1s left: 8

task is completed! cost:1s left: 7

task is completed! cost:2s left: 6

task is completed! cost:3s left: 4

task is completed! cost:3s left: 5

task is completed! cost:3s left: 3

task is completed! cost:3s left: 1

task is completed! cost:3s left: 2

task is completed! cost:4s left: 0

all task is completed! result=10 cost: 4110ms

我原先还写过另一个复杂版本:

/**
 * @author mx
 */
public class FutureTaskDemo {

    private static AtomicInteger count = new AtomicInteger(10);

    public static void main(String[] args) throws ExecutionException, InterruptedException {
        // 准备10个线程
        ExecutorService executorService = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(10);

        // 收集任务
        List<Callable<Integer>> taskList = new ArrayList<>();
        // 收集结果
        List<Future<Integer>> resultList = new ArrayList<>();

        long start = System.currentTimeMillis();

        // 先准备10个任务
        for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
            Callable<Integer> task = () -> {
                // 模拟任务耗时 0~4秒
                int seconds = ThreadLocalRandom.current().nextInt(5);
                TimeUnit.SECONDS.sleep(seconds);
                System.out.println("task is completed! cost:" + seconds + "s left: " + count.decrementAndGet());
                // 模拟返回结果
                return 1;
            };
            // 收集任务
            taskList.add(task);
        }

        // 10个任务并行执行
        for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
            // 从任务列表取出任务,丢到线程池执行
            Future<Integer> partResult = executorService.submit(taskList.get(i));
            // 收集异步结果
            resultList.add(partResult);
        }

        // 最终结果,用于累加
        int result = 0;

        // 是否全部结束,否则一直循环等待
        while (notFinished(resultList)) {
            // wait for all task to be completed...
        }

        // 主线程执行到这,肯定全部任务已经结束,所以get()会立即返回结果,不会再阻塞等待
        for (Future<Integer> future : resultList) {
            result += future.get();
        }

        // 最终全部任务完成,总耗时取决于最耗时的任务时长
        System.out.println("all task is completed! result=" + result + " cost: " + (System.currentTimeMillis() - start) + "ms");
    }

    /**
     * 是否全部完成
     *
     * @param list
     * @return
     */
    private static boolean notFinished(List<Future<Integer>> list) {
        for (Future<Integer> future : list) {
            if (!future.isDone()) {
                return true;
            }
        }
        return false;
    }
}

结果展示

task is completed! cost:0s left: 9

task is completed! cost:0s left: 8

task is completed! cost:2s left: 7

task is completed! cost:3s left: 6

task is completed! cost:3s left: 3

task is completed! cost:3s left: 4

task is completed! cost:3s left: 5

task is completed! cost:4s left: 2

task is completed! cost:4s left: 1

task is completed! cost:4s left: 0

all task is completed! result=10 cost: 4051ms

在当前场景下,其实没必要。

有些人可能觉得第一个版本会出现以下问题:

假设总共就2个任务,但是第一个任务耗时3秒,第二个任务耗时1秒。第二个任务的1秒是建立在第一个任务的3秒后,所以总耗时就变成了4秒。

实际上并不会。当future1#get()阻塞获取第一个任务结果的过程中,第二个任务已经完成,所以future2.get()不会再阻塞,而是直接返回结果。

CountDownLatch

CountDownLatch是什么?学名叫闭锁,俗名叫门栓。

/**
 * @author mx
 */
public class CountDownLatchDemo {

    public static void main(String[] args) throws InterruptedException {
        // 1.先看简单demo,了解下CountDownLatch
        mainThreadAndAsyncThread();
        // 2.尝试使用CountDownLatch解决任务并行问题(不处理结果)
//        multiThreadTask();
    }

    /**
     * CountDownLatch简单demo
     *
     * @throws InterruptedException
     */
    private static void mainThreadAndAsyncThread() throws InterruptedException {
        // 准备一个countDownLatch,设置10,相当于给门加了10把锁
        CountDownLatch countDownLatch = new CountDownLatch(10);

        long start = System.currentTimeMillis();

        // 副线程去处理任务,每个任务耗时1秒,每处理完1个任务就解开一把锁
        new Thread(() -> {
            for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
                try {
                    Thread.sleep(1000L);
                } catch (InterruptedException e) {
                    e.printStackTrace();
                }
                countDownAndPrint(countDownLatch, 1);
            }
        }).start();

        // 一夫当关,万夫莫开。只要门上10把锁没有全部解开,任何线程都别想想往下走
        countDownLatch.await();

        System.out.println("all task is completed! cost: " + (System.currentTimeMillis() - start) + "ms");
    }

    /**
     * CountDownLatch应用:演示10个任务并行执行,全部完成后返回结果
     *
     * @throws InterruptedException
     */
    private static void multiThreadTask() throws InterruptedException {
        // 准备一个countDownLatch,设置10,相当于给门加了10把锁
        CountDownLatch countDownLatch = new CountDownLatch(10);

        long start = System.currentTimeMillis();

        // 启动10个线程执行任务
        for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
            new Thread(() -> {
                try {
                    // 线程进来执行任务,随机睡0~4秒
                    int seconds = ThreadLocalRandom.current().nextInt(5);
                    TimeUnit.SECONDS.sleep(seconds);
                    // 每完成一个任务,解开一把锁
                    countDownAndPrint(countDownLatch, seconds);
                } catch (InterruptedException e) {
                    e.printStackTrace();
                }
            }).start();
        }

        // 一夫当关,万夫莫开。只要门上10把锁没有全部解开,任何线程都别想想往下走
        countDownLatch.await();

        System.out.println("all task is completed! cost: " + (System.currentTimeMillis() - start) + "ms");
    }

    /**
     * countDown()并且打印,其实是不需要加synchronized的,这里只是为了多线程环境下正确打印
     *
     * @param countDownLatch
     * @param seconds
     */
    private static synchronized void countDownAndPrint(CountDownLatch countDownLatch, int seconds) {
        countDownLatch.countDown();
        System.out.println("task completed, cost: " + seconds + "s left: " + countDownLatch.getCount());
    }
}

结果展示

task is completed! cost:0s left: 9

task is completed! cost:0s left: 8

task is completed! cost:0s left: 7

task is completed! cost:2s left: 6

task is completed! cost:2s left: 5

task is completed! cost:2s left: 3

task is completed! cost:2s left: 4

task is completed! cost:3s left: 2

task is completed! cost:4s left: 1

task is completed! cost:4s left: 0

all task is completed! result=10 cost: 4049ms

CompletableFuture

顺便说一句,上面的两个Demo都是闹着玩呢,实际开发别傻不拉几地自己写哈...会被打,而且是背身单打颜扣的那种。

/**
 * @author mx
 */
public class CompletableFutureDemo {

    private static AtomicInteger count = new AtomicInteger(10);

    public static void main(String[] args) throws InterruptedException, ExecutionException {

        // 准备10个线程
        ExecutorService executorService = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(10);
        // 收集结果
        List<CompletableFuture<Integer>> resultList = new ArrayList<>();

        long start = System.currentTimeMillis();

        // 任务并行
        for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
            CompletableFuture<Integer> completableFuture = CompletableFuture.supplyAsync(() -> {
                // 模拟任务耗时 0~4秒
                try {
                    int seconds = ThreadLocalRandom.current().nextInt(5);
                    TimeUnit.SECONDS.sleep(seconds);
                    System.out.println("task is completed! cost:" + seconds + "s left: " + count.decrementAndGet());
                } catch (InterruptedException e) {
                    e.printStackTrace();
                }
                // 模拟返回结果
                return 1;
            }, executorService);
            resultList.add(completableFuture);
        }

        // 处理结果
        int result = 0;
        for (CompletableFuture<Integer> completableFuture : resultList) {
            result += completableFuture.get();
        }

        // 最终全部任务完成,总耗时取决于最耗时的任务时长
        System.out.println("all task is completed! result=" + result + " cost: " + (System.currentTimeMillis() - start) + "ms");
    }
}

结果展示

task is completed! cost:0s left: 9

task is completed! cost:0s left: 8

task is completed! cost:0s left: 7

task is completed! cost:0s left: 6

task is completed! cost:2s left: 5

task is completed! cost:3s left: 4

task is completed! cost:3s left: 3

task is completed! cost:3s left: 2

task is completed! cost:4s left: 1

task is completed! cost:4s left: 0

all task is completed! result=10 cost: 4051ms

实际开发案例

public class CompletableFutureDemo {

    private static AtomicInteger count = new AtomicInteger(2);

    public static void main(String[] args) throws InterruptedException, ExecutionException {

        // 准备10个线程
        ExecutorService executorService = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(2);

        long start = System.currentTimeMillis();

        // 模拟处理订单
        CompletableFuture<Void> dealOrder = CompletableFuture.runAsync(() -> {
            // 模拟任务耗时 0~4秒
            try {
                int seconds = ThreadLocalRandom.current().nextInt(5);
                TimeUnit.SECONDS.sleep(seconds);
                System.out.println("task is completed! cost:" + seconds + "s left: " + count.decrementAndGet());
            } catch (InterruptedException e) {
                e.printStackTrace();
            }
        }, executorService);

        // 模拟处理库存
        CompletableFuture<Void> dealStock = CompletableFuture.runAsync(() -> {
            // 模拟任务耗时 0~4秒
            try {
                int seconds = ThreadLocalRandom.current().nextInt(5);
                TimeUnit.SECONDS.sleep(seconds);
                System.out.println("task is completed! cost:" + seconds + "s left: " + count.decrementAndGet());
            } catch (InterruptedException e) {
                e.printStackTrace();
            }
        }, executorService);

        // 可变参数,可以传任意个CompletableFuture,阻塞等待所有任务完成
        CompletableFuture.allOf(dealOrder, dealStock).get();

        // 最终全部任务完成,总耗时取决于最耗时的任务时长
        System.out.println("all task is completed! cost: " + (System.currentTimeMillis() - start) + "ms");
    }
}

结果展示

task is completed! cost:2s left: 1

task is completed! cost:3s left: 0

all task is completed! cost: 3058ms

文章来源:https://blog.csdn.net/smart_an/article/details/135332364
本文来自互联网用户投稿,该文观点仅代表作者本人,不代表本站立场。本站仅提供信息存储空间服务,不拥有所有权,不承担相关法律责任。