企业级实战项目：基于 pycaret 自动化预测公司是否破产
发布时间：2023年12月26日
本文系数据挖掘实战系列文章，我跟大家分享一个数据挖掘实战，与以往的数据实战不同的是，用自动机器学习方法完成模型构建与调优部分工作，深入理解由此带来的便利与效果。
1. Introduction
本文是一篇数据挖掘实战案例，详细探索了从台湾经济杂志收集的1999年到2009年的数据，看看在数据探索过程中，可以洞察出哪些有用的信息，判断哪一个模型能够最准确地预测公司是否破产。
公司破产的定义是根据台湾证券交易所的商业规则而定的。
该建模将尝试使用自动机器学习库pycaret来构建机器学习模型，pycaret是一个用python编写的开源低代码机器学习库，它将机器学习工作流程自动化。如果你想探索这个库并更好地理解它的功能。推荐查看
设置环境并读取数据
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
import math
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import seaborn as sns
bankruptcy_df = pd.read_csv("Bankruptcy.csv")
bankruptcy_df.head()
技术交流&源码获取
技术要学会交流、分享，不建议闭门造车。一个人可以走的很快、一堆人可以走的更远。
好的文章离不开粉丝的分享、推荐，资料干货、资料分享、数据、技术交流提升，均可加交流群获取，群友已超过2000人，添加时最好的备注方式为：来源+兴趣方向，方便找到志同道合的朋友。
本文数据&源码，技术交流、按照如下方式获取：
方式①、添加微信号：dkl88194，备注：资料
方式②、微信搜索公众号：Python学习与数据挖掘，后台回复：资料
资料1
资料2
我们打造了《100个超强算法模型》，特点：从0到1轻松学习，原理、代码、案例应有尽有，所有的算法模型都是按照这样的节奏进行表述，所以是一套完完整整的案例库。
很多初学者是有这么一个痛点，就是案例，案例的完整性直接影响同学的兴致。因此，我整理了 100个最常见的算法模型，在你的学习路上助推一把！
2. 理解数据
bankruptcy_df.info()
<class 'pandas.core.frame.DataFrame'>
RangeIndex: 6819 entries, 0 to 6818
Data columns (total 96 columns):
# Column Non-Null Count Dtype
--- ------ -------------- -----
0 Bankrupt? 6819 non-null int64
1 ROA(C) before interest and depreciation before interest 6819 non-null float64
2 ROA(A) before interest and % after tax 6819 non-null float64
3 ROA(B) before interest and depreciation after tax 6819 non-null float64
4 Operating Gross Margin 6819 non-null float64
5 Realized Sales Gross Margin 6819 non-null float64
6 Operating Profit Rate 6819 non-null float64
7 Pre-tax net Interest Rate 6819 non-null float64
8 After-tax net Interest Rate 6819 non-null float64
9 Non-industry income and expenditure/revenue 6819 non-null float64
10 Continuous interest rate (after tax) 6819 non-null float64
11 Operating Expense Rate 6819 non-null float64
12 Research and development expense rate 6819 non-null float64
13 Cash flow rate 6819 non-null float64
14 Interest-bearing debt interest rate 6819 non-null float64
15 Tax rate (A) 6819 non-null float64
16 Net Value Per Share (B) 6819 non-null float64
17 Net Value Per Share (A) 6819 non-null float64
18 Net Value Per Share (C) 6819 non-null float64
19 Persistent EPS in the Last Four Seasons 6819 non-null float64
20 Cash Flow Per Share 6819 non-null float64
21 Revenue Per Share (Yuan ￥) 6819 non-null float64
22 Operating Profit Per Share (Yuan ￥) 6819 non-null float64
23 Per Share Net profit before tax (Yuan ￥) 6819 non-null float64
24 Realized Sales Gross Profit Growth Rate 6819 non-null float64
25 Operating Profit Growth Rate 6819 non-null float64
26 After-tax Net Profit Growth Rate 6819 non-null float64
27 Regular Net Profit Growth Rate 6819 non-null float64
28 Continuous Net Profit Growth Rate 6819 non-null float64
29 Total Asset Growth Rate 6819 non-null float64
30 Net Value Growth Rate 6819 non-null float64
31 Total Asset Return Growth Rate Ratio 6819 non-null float64
32 Cash Reinvestment % 6819 non-null float64
33 Current Ratio 6819 non-null float64
34 Quick Ratio 6819 non-null float64
35 Interest Expense Ratio 6819 non-null float64
36 Total debt/Total net worth 6819 non-null float64
37 Debt ratio % 6819 non-null float64
38 Net worth/Assets 6819 non-null float64
39 Long-term fund suitability ratio (A) 6819 non-null float64
40 Borrowing dependency 6819 non-null float64
41 Contingent liabilities/Net worth 6819 non-null float64
42 Operating profit/Paid-in capital 6819 non-null float64
43 Net profit before tax/Paid-in capital 6819 non-null float64
44 Inventory and accounts receivable/Net value 6819 non-null float64
45 Total Asset Turnover 6819 non-null float64
46 Accounts Receivable Turnover 6819 non-null float64
47 Average Collection Days 6819 non-null float64
48 Inventory Turnover Rate (times) 6819 non-null float64
49 Fixed Assets Turnover Frequency 6819 non-null float64
50 Net Worth Turnover Rate (times) 6819 non-null float64
51 Revenue per person 6819 non-null float64
52 Operating profit per person 6819 non-null float64
53 Allocation rate per person 6819 non-null float64
54 Working Capital to Total Assets 6819 non-null float64
55 Quick Assets/Total Assets 6819 non-null float64
56 Current Assets/Total Assets 6819 non-null float64
57 Cash/Total Assets 6819 non-null float64
58 Quick Assets/Current Liability 6819 non-null float64
59 Cash/Current Liability 6819 non-null float64
60 Current Liability to Assets 6819 non-null float64
61 Operating Funds to Liability 6819 non-null float64
62 Inventory/Working Capital 6819 non-null float64
63 Inventory/Current Liability 6819 non-null float64
64 Current Liabilities/Liability 6819 non-null float64
65 Working Capital/Equity 6819 non-null float64
66 Current Liabilities/Equity 6819 non-null float64
67 Long-term Liability to Current Assets 6819 non-null float64
68 Retained Earnings to Total Assets 6819 non-null float64
69 Total income/Total expense 6819 non-null float64
70 Total expense/Assets 6819 non-null float64
71 Current Asset Turnover Rate 6819 non-null float64
72 Quick Asset Turnover Rate 6819 non-null float64
73 Working capitcal Turnover Rate 6819 non-null float64
74 Cash Turnover Rate 6819 non-null float64
75 Cash Flow to Sales 6819 non-null float64
76 Fixed Assets to Assets 6819 non-null float64
77 Current Liability to Liability 6819 non-null float64
78 Current Liability to Equity 6819 non-null float64
79 Equity to Long-term Liability 6819 non-null float64
80 Cash Flow to Total Assets 6819 non-null float64
81 Cash Flow to Liability 6819 non-null float64
82 CFO to Assets 6819 non-null float64
83 Cash Flow to Equity 6819 non-null float64
84 Current Liability to Current Assets 6819 non-null float64
85 Liability-Assets Flag 6819 non-null int64
86 Net Income to Total Assets 6819 non-null float64
87 Total assets to GNP price 6819 non-null float64
88 No-credit Interval 6819 non-null float64
89 Gross Profit to Sales 6819 non-null float64
90 Net Income to Stockholder's Equity 6819 non-null float64
91 Liability to Equity 6819 non-null float64
92 Degree of Financial Leverage (DFL) 6819 non-null float64
93 Interest Coverage Ratio (Interest expense to EBIT) 6819 non-null float64
94 Net Income Flag 6819 non-null int64
95 Equity to Liability 6819 non-null float64
dtypes: float64(93), int64(3)
memory usage: 5.0 MB
bankruptcy_df.shape
(6819, 96)
bankruptcy_df.describe()
3. 数据探索与清洗
3.1 缺失值处理
bankruptcy_df.columns[bankruptcy_df.isna().any()]
Index([], dtype='object')
从结果看，改数据集非常完整，没有缺失值！
.any()指的是有没有(缺失值)，而与之对应的.all()指的是是否都是(缺失值)
调整数据列名
def clean_col_names(col_name):
col_name = (
col_name.strip()
.replace("?", "_")
.replace("(", "_")
.replace(")", "_")
.replace(" ", "_")
.replace("/", "_")
.replace("-", "_")
.replace("__", "_")
.replace("'", "")
.lower()
)
return col_name
bank_columns = list(bankruptcy_df.columns)
bank_columns = [clean_col_names(col_name) for col_name in bank_columns]
bankruptcy_df.columns = bank_columns
display(bankruptcy_df.columns)
Index(['bankrupt_', 'roa_c_before_interest_and_depreciation_before_interest',
'roa_a_before_interest_and_%_after_tax',
'roa_b_before_interest_and_depreciation_after_tax',
'operating_gross_margin', 'realized_sales_gross_margin',
'operating_profit_rate', 'pre_tax_net_interest_rate',
'after_tax_net_interest_rate',
'non_industry_income_and_expenditure_revenue',
'continuous_interest_rate_after_tax_', 'operating_expense_rate',
'research_and_development_expense_rate', 'cash_flow_rate',
'interest_bearing_debt_interest_rate', 'tax_rate_a_',
'net_value_per_share_b_', 'net_value_per_share_a_',
'net_value_per_share_c_', 'persistent_eps_in_the_last_four_seasons',
'cash_flow_per_share', 'revenue_per_share_yuan_￥_',
'operating_profit_per_share_yuan_￥_',
'per_share_net_profit_before_tax_yuan_￥_',
'realized_sales_gross_profit_growth_rate',
'operating_profit_growth_rate', 'after_tax_net_profit_growth_rate',
'regular_net_profit_growth_rate', 'continuous_net_profit_growth_rate',
'total_asset_growth_rate', 'net_value_growth_rate',
'total_asset_return_growth_rate_ratio', 'cash_reinvestment_%',
'current_ratio', 'quick_ratio', 'interest_expense_ratio',
'total_debt_total_net_worth', 'debt_ratio_%', 'net_worth_assets',
'long_term_fund_suitability_ratio_a_', 'borrowing_dependency',
'contingent_liabilities_net_worth', 'operating_profit_paid_in_capital',
'net_profit_before_tax_paid_in_capital',
'inventory_and_accounts_receivable_net_value', 'total_asset_turnover',
'accounts_receivable_turnover', 'average_collection_days',
'inventory_turnover_rate_times_', 'fixed_assets_turnover_frequency',
'net_worth_turnover_rate_times_', 'revenue_per_person',
'operating_profit_per_person', 'allocation_rate_per_person',
'working_capital_to_total_assets', 'quick_assets_total_assets',
'current_assets_total_assets', 'cash_total_assets',
'quick_assets_current_liability', 'cash_current_liability',
'current_liability_to_assets', 'operating_funds_to_liability',
'inventory_working_capital', 'inventory_current_liability',
'current_liabilities_liability', 'working_capital_equity',
'current_liabilities_equity', 'long_term_liability_to_current_assets',
'retained_earnings_to_total_assets', 'total_income_total_expense',
'total_expense_assets', 'current_asset_turnover_rate',
'quick_asset_turnover_rate', 'working_capitcal_turnover_rate',
'cash_turnover_rate', 'cash_flow_to_sales', 'fixed_assets_to_assets',
'current_liability_to_liability', 'current_liability_to_equity',
'equity_to_long_term_liability', 'cash_flow_to_total_assets',
'cash_flow_to_liability', 'cfo_to_assets', 'cash_flow_to_equity',
'current_liability_to_current_assets', 'liability_assets_flag',
'net_income_to_total_assets', 'total_assets_to_gnp_price',
'no_credit_interval', 'gross_profit_to_sales',
'net_income_to_stockholders_equity', 'liability_to_equity',
'degree_of_financial_leverage_dfl_',
'interest_coverage_ratio_interest_expense_to_ebit_', 'net_income_flag',
'equity_to_liability'],
dtype='object')
统计并绘制目标变量
该步骤的目的是查看目标变量是否平衡，如果不平衡，则需要针对性处理。
class_bar=sns.countplot(data=bankruptcy_df,x="bankrupt_")
ax = plt.gca()
for p in ax.patches:
ax.annotate('{:.1f}'.format(p.get_height()), (p.get_x()+0.3, p.get_height()+500))
class_bar
3.2 特征分布
检查偏态
# Return true/false if skewed
import scipy.stats
skew_df = pd.DataFrame(bankruptcy_df.select_dtypes(np.number).columns, columns = ['Feature'])
skew_df['Skew'] = skew_df['Feature'].apply(lambda feature: scipy.stats.skew(bankruptcy_df[feature]))
skew_df['Absolute Skew'] = skew_df['Skew'].apply(abs)
# 得到与方向无关的倾斜幅度
skew_df['Skewed']= skew_df['Absolute Skew'].apply(lambda x: True if x>= 0.5 else False)
with pd.option_context("display.max_rows", 1000):
display(skew_df)
可视化分布
cols = list(bankruptcy_df.columns)
ncols = 8
nrows = math.ceil(len(cols) / ncols)
fig, ax = plt.subplots(nrows, ncols, figsize = (4.5 * ncols, 4 * nrows))
for i in range(len(cols)):
sns.kdeplot(bankruptcy_df[cols[i]], ax = ax[i // ncols, i % ncols])
if i % ncols != 0:
ax[i // ncols, i % ncols].set_ylabel(" ")
plt.tight_layout()
plt.show()
查看有偏态的特征
query_skew=skew_df.query("Skewed == True")["Feature"]
with pd.option_context("display.max_rows", 1000):
display(query_skew)
0 bankrupt_
2 roa_a_before_interest_and_%_after_tax
3 roa_b_before_interest_and_depreciation_after_tax
4 operating_gross_margin
5 realized_sales_gross_margin
6 operating_profit_rate
7 pre_tax_net_interest_rate
8 after_tax_net_interest_rate
9 non_industry_income_and_expenditure_revenue
10 continuous_interest_rate_after_tax_
11 operating_expense_rate
12 research_and_development_expense_rate
13 cash_flow_rate
14 interest_bearing_debt_interest_rate
15 tax_rate_a_
16 net_value_per_share_b_
17 net_value_per_share_a_
18 net_value_per_share_c_
19 persistent_eps_in_the_last_four_seasons
20 cash_flow_per_share
21 revenue_per_share_yuan_￥_
22 operating_profit_per_share_yuan_￥_
23 per_share_net_profit_before_tax_yuan_￥_
24 realized_sales_gross_profit_growth_rate
25 operating_profit_growth_rate
26 after_tax_net_profit_growth_rate
27 regular_net_profit_growth_rate
28 continuous_net_profit_growth_rate
29 total_asset_growth_rate
30 net_value_growth_rate
31 total_asset_return_growth_rate_ratio
32 cash_reinvestment_%
33 current_ratio
34 quick_ratio
35 interest_expense_ratio
36 total_debt_total_net_worth
37 debt_ratio_%
38 net_worth_assets
39 long_term_fund_suitability_ratio_a_
40 borrowing_dependency
41 contingent_liabilities_net_worth
42 operating_profit_paid_in_capital
43 net_profit_before_tax_paid_in_capital
44 inventory_and_accounts_receivable_net_value
45 total_asset_turnover
46 accounts_receivable_turnover
47 average_collection_days
48 inventory_turnover_rate_times_
49 fixed_assets_turnover_frequency
50 net_worth_turnover_rate_times_
51 revenue_per_person
52 operating_profit_per_person
53 allocation_rate_per_person
57 cash_total_assets
58 quick_assets_current_liability
59 cash_current_liability
60 current_liability_to_assets
61 operating_funds_to_liability
62 inventory_working_capital
63 inventory_current_liability
64 current_liabilities_liability
65 working_capital_equity
66 current_liabilities_equity
67 long_term_liability_to_current_assets
68 retained_earnings_to_total_assets
69 total_income_total_expense
70 total_expense_assets
71 current_asset_turnover_rate
72 quick_asset_turnover_rate
73 working_capitcal_turnover_rate
74 cash_turnover_rate
75 cash_flow_to_sales
76 fixed_assets_to_assets
77 current_liability_to_liability
78 current_liability_to_equity
79 equity_to_long_term_liability
81 cash_flow_to_liability
83 cash_flow_to_equity
84 current_liability_to_current_assets
85 liability_assets_flag
86 net_income_to_total_assets
87 total_assets_to_gnp_price
88 no_credit_interval
89 gross_profit_to_sales
90 net_income_to_stockholders_equity
91 liability_to_equity
92 degree_of_financial_leverage_dfl_
93 interest_coverage_ratio_interest_expense_to_ebit_
95 equity_to_liability
Name: Feature, dtype: object
进行下采样，直至样本集中的破产与非破产比例为50/50。完成之后再次对数据进行偏态检查，决定是否需要做log转换，另外进行相关矩阵分析。
3.3 下采样
首先对数据集进行下采样，目标比例为bankrupt vs non bankrupt = 50 vs 50。
bankruptcy_df2 = bankruptcy_df.sample(frac=1) #Shuffle Bankruptcy df
bankruptcy_df_b = bankruptcy_df2.loc[bankruptcy_df2["bankrupt_"] == 1]
bankruptcy_df_nb = bankruptcy_df2.loc[bankruptcy_df2["bankrupt_"] == 0][:220]
bankruptcy_subdf_comb = pd.concat([bankruptcy_df_b,bankruptcy_df_nb])
bankruptcy_subdf = bankruptcy_subdf_comb.sample(frac=1,random_state=42)
bankruptcy_subdf
再次绘图查看正负样本数。
sns.countplot(bankruptcy_subdf["bankrupt_"])
随机选择220家非破产公司和220家破产公司。
4. 特征工程
bankruptcy_subdf2 = bankruptcy_subdf.drop(["net_income_flag"],axis=1)
bankruptcy_subdf2.shape
(440, 95)
4.1 相关矩阵
fig = plt.figure(figsize=(30,20))
ax1 = fig.add_subplot(1,1,1)
sns.heatmap(bankruptcy_subdf2.corr(),ax=ax1,cmap="coolwarm")
4.1.1 找出与破产相关的最高特征
根据对破产企业的基本认识，破产企业资产少、负债高、盈利能力低、现金流少。可以朝这个方向分析我们的数据集。
corr=bankruptcy_subdf2[bankruptcy_subdf2.columns[:-1]].corr()['bankrupt_'][:]
corr_df = pd.DataFrame(corr)
print("Correlations to Bankruptcy:")
for index, row in corr_df["bankrupt_"].iteritems():
if row!=1.0 and row>=0.5:
print(f'Positive Correlation: {index}')
elif row!=1.0 and row<=-0.5:
print(f'Negative Correlation: {index}')
Correlations to Bankruptcy:
Negative Correlation: roa_c_before_interest_and_depreciation_before_interest
Negative Correlation: roa_b_before_interest_and_depreciation_after_tax
Negative Correlation: net_value_per_share_b_
Negative Correlation: net_value_per_share_a_
Negative Correlation: net_value_per_share_c_
Negative Correlation: persistent_eps_in_the_last_four_seasons
Negative Correlation: per_share_net_profit_before_tax_yuan_￥_
Positive Correlation: debt_ratio_%
Negative Correlation: net_worth_assets
Negative Correlation: net_profit_before_tax_paid_in_capital
Negative Correlation: total_income_total_expense
这些特征代表什么
-
roa_c_before_interest_and_depreciation_before_interest息前资产收益率和息前折旧：总资产收益率–如果总资产收益率低，破产风险高
-
roa_a_before_interest_and_after_tax息前和税后利润：总资产回报率–如果总资产回报率较低，破产风险较高
-
roa_b_before_interest_and_depreciation_after_tax利润不计利息及税后折旧：总资产回报率–如果总资产回报率较低，破产风险较高
-
debt_ratio负债率：负债占总资产的比例–价值越高，负债占资产的比例越高，导致破产风险越高
-
net_worth_assets净资产：净资产越少，破产风险越高
-
retained_earnings_to_total_assets留存收益与总资产之比：留存收益越少，破产风险越高
-
total_income_total_expense总费用：收入与费用之比较低，破产风险较高
-
net_income_to_total_assets净收入与总资产之比：净收入越低，破产风险越高
从结果看，导致公司违约风险越高的特征，似乎与背景知识一致。
4.2 下采样后特征分布可视化
# Visualisation of distributions after sub-sampling
cols = list(bankruptcy_subdf2.columns)
ncols = 8
nrows = math.ceil(len(cols) / ncols)
fig, ax = plt.subplots(nrows, ncols, figsize = (4.5 * ncols, 4 * nrows))
for i in range(len(cols)):
sns.kdeplot(bankruptcy_subdf2[cols[i]], ax = ax[i // ncols, i % ncols])
if i % ncols != 0:
ax[i // ncols, i % ncols].set_ylabel(" ")
plt.tight_layout()
plt.show()
4.3 所有特征的箱线图
plt.figure(figsize=(30,20))
boxplot=sns.boxplot(data=bankruptcy_subdf2,orient="h")
boxplot.set(xscale="log")
plt.show()
4.4 异常值处理
quartile1 = bankruptcy_subdf2.quantile(q=0.25,axis=0)
# display(quartile1)
quartile3 = bankruptcy_subdf2.quantile(q=0.75,axis=0)
# display(quartile3)
IQR = quartile3 -quartile1
lower_limit = quartile1-1.5*IQR
upper_limit = quartile3+1.5*IQR
lower_limit = lower_limit.drop(["bankrupt_"])
upper_limit = upper_limit.drop(["bankrupt_"])
# print(lower_limit)
# print(" ")
# print(upper_limit)
bankruptcy_subdf2_out = bankruptcy_subdf2[((bankruptcy_subdf2<lower_limit) | (bankruptcy_subdf2>upper_limit)).any(axis=1)]
display(bankruptcy_subdf2_out.shape)
display(bankruptcy_subdf2.shape)
(423, 95)
(440, 95)
额外复制一份表，供后续分析处理。
bankruptcy_subdf3 = bankruptcy_subdf2_out.copy()
bankruptcy_subdf3
下采样后且去除离群值后的分布可视化。
# Visualisation of distributions after sub-sampling after outlier removal
cols = list(bankruptcy_subdf3.columns)
ncols = 8
nrows = math.ceil(len(cols) / ncols)
fig, ax = plt.subplots(nrows, ncols, figsize = (4.5 * ncols, 4 * nrows))
for i in range(len(cols)):
sns.kdeplot(bankruptcy_subdf3[cols[i]], ax = ax[i // ncols, i % ncols],fill=True,color="red")
sns.kdeplot(bankruptcy_subdf2[cols[i]], ax = ax[i // ncols, i % ncols],color="green")
if i % ncols != 0:
ax[i // ncols, i % ncols].set_ylabel(" ")
plt.tight_layout()
plt.show()
5 数据预处理
5.1 特征编码
所有类别在基础数据中都已编码完成，因此这里不需要再次编码列。在实际工作中，这一步大概率是必不可少的，编码技术也是尤其重要，需要好好掌握。如果你还不了解或不是很了解，推荐查看：
5.2 Log转换
这一步是为了去除数据中的偏态分布。
# Log transform to remove skews
target = bankruptcy_subdf3['bankrupt_']
bankruptcy_subdf4 = bankruptcy_subdf3.drop(["bankrupt_"],axis=1)
def log_trans(data):
for col in data:
skew = data[col].skew()
if skew>=0.5 or skew<=0.5:
data[col] = np.log1p(data[col])
else:
continue
return data
bankruptcy_subdf4_log = log_trans(bankruptcy_subdf4)
bankruptcy_subdf4_log.head()
5.2.1 Log转换数据的箱线图
plt.figure(figsize=(30,20))
boxplot=sns.boxplot(data=bankruptcy_subdf4_log,orient="h")
boxplot.set(xscale="log")
plt.show()
5.2.2 Log转换后的数据分布可视化
# 在下采样后、去除离群值及log变换后的数据分布的可视化
compare_subdf2 = bankruptcy_subdf2.drop(["bankrupt_"],axis=1)
cols = list(bankruptcy_subdf4.columns)
ncols = 8
nrows = math.ceil(len(cols) / ncols)
fig, ax = plt.subplots(nrows, ncols, figsize = (4.5 * ncols, 4 * nrows))
for i in range(len(cols)):
sns.kdeplot(bankruptcy_subdf4_log[cols[i]], ax = ax[i // ncols, i % ncols],fill=True,color="red")
sns.kdeplot(bankruptcy_subdf2[cols[i]], ax = ax[i // ncols, i % ncols],color="green")
if i % ncols != 0:
ax[i // ncols, i % ncols].set_ylabel(" ")
plt.tight_layout()
plt.show()
print("Red represents distributions after log transforms, green represents before log transform")
红色表示Log变换后的分布，绿色表示Log变换前的分布。（完整数据集：关注@公众号：数据STUDIO，联系云朵君获取）
6 使用Pycaret构建模型
本次模型构建使用的是自动机器学习框架pycaret，如果你还没有安装，可使用下述命令安装即可。
pip install -U --ignore-installed --pre pycaret
在pycaret中自动完成训练及测试数据的切分工作。
from pycaret.classification import *
exp_name = setup(data = bankruptcy_subdf4, target = bankruptcy_subdf3["bankrupt_"])
compare_models()
Pycaret显示，3种模型的准确性最高的是
-
LightGBM分类器
-
梯度提升GBC分类器
-
XGBoost分类器
接下来将使用这5个模型进行超参数调优。
6.1 选定模型交叉验证
LightGBM
print("LGBM Model")
lgb_clf = create_model("lightgbm")
lgb_clf_scoregrid = pull()
LGBM Model
GBC
print("GBC Model")
gbc_clf = create_model("gbc")
gbc_clf_scoregrid = pull()
GBC Model
XGBoost
print("XGB Model")
xgb_clf = create_model("xgboost")
xgb_clf_scoregrid = pull()
XGB Model
7 使用Pycaret进行超参数调优
7.1 模型调优
LightGBM
print("Before Tuning")
print(lgb_clf_scoregrid.loc[["Mean","Std"]])
print("")
lgb_clf = tune_model(lgb_clf,choose_better=True)
print(lgb_clf)
Before Tuning
Accuracy AUC Recall Prec. F1 Kappa MCC
Fold
Mean 0.8433 0.9233 0.8562 0.8497 0.8495 0.6866 0.6929
Std 0.0524 0.0429 0.0802 0.0681 0.0506 0.1046 0.1048
GBC
print("Before Tuning")
print(gbc_clf_scoregrid.loc[["Mean","Std"]])
print("")
gbc_clf = tune_model(gbc_clf,choose_better=True)
print(gbc_clf)
Before Tuning
Accuracy AUC Recall Prec. F1 Kappa MCC
Fold
Mean 0.8329 0.9242 0.8558 0.8324 0.8419 0.6649 0.6691
Std 0.0599 0.0403 0.0634 0.0750 0.0557 0.1204 0.1198
XGBoost
print("Before Tuning")
print(xgb_clf_scoregrid.loc[["Mean","Std"]])
print("")
xgb_clf = tune_model(xgb_clf,choose_better = True)
print(xgb_clf)
Before Tuning
Accuracy AUC Recall Prec. F1 Kappa MCC
Fold
Mean 0.8400 0.9270 0.8562 0.8410 0.8460 0.6797 0.6852
Std 0.0582 0.0382 0.0906 0.0586 0.0583 0.1161 0.1187
7.2 模型集成
-
Bagged & Boosting 方法
-
Blending
-
Stacking
LightGBM
# Original
print(lgb_clf_scoregrid.loc[['Mean', 'Std']])
# Compare the original against bagged and boosted
# Bagged
lgb_clf = ensemble_model(lgb_clf,fold =5,choose_better = True)
# Boosted
lgb_clf = ensemble_model(lgb_clf,method="Boosting",choose_better = True)
Accuracy AUC Recall Prec. F1 Kappa MCC
Fold
Mean 0.8433 0.9233 0.8562 0.8497 0.8495 0.6866 0.6929
Std 0.0524 0.0429 0.0802 0.0681 0.0506 0.1046 0.1048
GBC
# Original
print(gbc_clf_scoregrid.loc[['Mean', 'Std']])
# Compare the original against bagged and boosted
# Bagged
gbc_clf = ensemble_model(gbc_clf,fold =5,choose_better = True)
# Boosted
gbc_clf = ensemble_model(gbc_clf,method="Boosting",choose_better = True)
Accuracy AUC Recall Prec. F1 Kappa MCC
Fold
Mean 0.8329 0.9242 0.8558 0.8324 0.8419 0.6649 0.6691
Std 0.0599 0.0403 0.0634 0.0750 0.0557 0.1204 0.1198
XGBoost
# Original
print(xgb_clf_scoregrid.loc[['Mean', 'Std']])
# Compare the original and boosted against bagged and boosted
# Bagged
xgb_clf = ensemble_model(xgb_clf,fold =5,choose_better = True)
# Boosted
xgb_clf = ensemble_model(xgb_clf,method="Boosting",choose_better = True)
Accuracy AUC Recall Prec. F1 Kappa MCC
Fold
Mean 0.8400 0.9270 0.8562 0.8410 0.8460 0.6797 0.6852
Std 0.0582 0.0382 0.0906 0.0586 0.0583 0.1161 0.1187
7.3.1 Blend Models
blend_models([lgb_clf, gbc_clf, xgb_clf],choose_better=True)
7.3.2 Stacking
stacker = stack_models(lgb_clf,gbc_clf) #remove xgb as some issues
print(stacker)
8 模型评估
# evaluate_model(lgb_clf)
# evaluate_model(gbc_clf)
# evaluate_model(xgb_clf)
8.1 ROC-AUC
plot_model(stacker, plot = 'auc')
# Stacked classifier from ensembling
plot_model(lgb_clf, plot = 'auc')
# lgb最适合Bagging集成并被选中
plot_model(gbc_clf, plot = 'auc')
# gbc最适合Boosting集成并被选中
plot_model(xgb_clf, plot = 'auc')
# 基本的xgb分类器在经过调优和集成后仍然表现最好，因此选择了它
8.2 混淆矩阵
plot_model(stacker,
plot = 'confusion_matrix',
plot_kwargs = {'percent' : True})
plot_model(lgb_clf,
plot = 'confusion_matrix',
plot_kwargs = {'percent' : True})
plot_model(gbc_clf,
plot = 'confusion_matrix',
plot_kwargs = {'percent' : True})
plot_model(xgb_clf,
plot = 'confusion_matrix',
plot_kwargs = {'percent' : True})
8.3 学习曲线
plot_model(stacker, plot = 'learning')
plot_model(lgb_clf, plot = 'learning')
就到这里了！
文章来源:https://blog.csdn.net/qq_34160248/article/details/135232277
本文来自互联网用户投稿，该文观点仅代表作者本人，不代表本站立场。本站仅提供信息存储空间服务，不拥有所有权，不承担相关法律责任。 如若内容造成侵权/违法违规/事实不符，请联系我的编程经验分享网邮箱：chenni525@qq.com进行投诉反馈，一经查实，立即删除！
本文来自互联网用户投稿，该文观点仅代表作者本人，不代表本站立场。本站仅提供信息存储空间服务，不拥有所有权，不承担相关法律责任。 如若内容造成侵权/违法违规/事实不符，请联系我的编程经验分享网邮箱：chenni525@qq.com进行投诉反馈，一经查实，立即删除！
最新文章
- Python教程
- 深入理解 MySQL 中的 HAVING 关键字和聚合函数
- Qt之QChar编码（1）
- MyBatis入门基础篇
- 用Python脚本实现FFmpeg批量转换
- IDEA 2022.2 安装教程
- 【VBA】ColorIndex参照表
- 数字化校园实验室综合管理平台|推动实验室创新发展新引擎
- 如何测试Nginx防盗链是否生效？
- Spring Security 6.x 系列【69】扩展篇之认证技术
- Flask 账号详情展示
- 大模型最新动态-20240117
- 基于Java (spring-boot)的图书管理系统
- 绩效面谈时员工对绩效考核的结果不赞同，管理者应该如何处理？
- @SpringBootApplication自动配置原理剖析