【ECON30001】Advanced Microeconomics

发布时间：2023年12月28日
Instructions:
? There are 50 possible marks. Your percent score counts for 70% of the overall grade.
? Submit your work using Turnitin on Blackboard.
? Late submissions receive zero marks. Extensions cannot be granted by the lecturer.
If there are issues with submission, please contact assessment.econ@ds.man.ac.uk .
Keep a saved copy of your work.
? Please put your registration number as a header on each page. Do not put your name
anywhere in your answers.
? Producing a document in an acceptable format is part of the assessment. Your an
swers should be typed in an acceptable format (e.g. font size 12, at least 1.5 spaced,
every page numbered). Using Microsoft Word and saving in docx format is known
to work well with Turnitin.
? Mathematicsshould be typed. Digitally produced diagrams are encouraged. It is per
mitted to insert photographs (png format) of your own diagrams in your work. There
is no word limit. Please be aware that examiners attach importance to presentation
and the clarity with which answers are expressed.
? This assessment is an individual piece of work. Communication or collaboration
with others is not allowed. Do not share your work with others. Turnitin automati
cally detects plagiarism. Plagiarism is a serious academic offence. Be aware of the
rules regarding this issue. If you reference other published works, please do so in a
consistentstyle (e.g. Harvard style). Formal definitions may be used from the lecture
notes without referencing. Explanations must be in your own words.
Question 3 (15 marks). Professor Bob is designing an experiment to test if the Nash
bargaining solution accurately predicts the behaviour of real decision makers. He plans to
present pairs of subjects with problems such as the following:
The experiment will present a variety of different shapes of feasible payment pairs for
consideration. Professor Bob claims, correctly, that these represent bargaining problems if
the subjects are risk neutral. The editor of an economics journal, however, is very critical
of the assumption of risk neutrality. Explain how Professor Bob could adapt the experiment
to allow for risk aversion and discuss the relative costs and benefits of doing so.
文章来源:https://blog.csdn.net/2301_81856980/article/details/135270744
本文来自互联网用户投稿，该文观点仅代表作者本人，不代表本站立场。本站仅提供信息存储空间服务，不拥有所有权，不承担相关法律责任。
最新文章